Open access

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Mental Health

Publication: Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
April 1986

Abstract

As costs rise and demands for services increase, governments are beginning to insist that mental health program administrators demonstrate that they are “worthwhile” in terms of results produced (outcomes) for money invested (costs). Cost-effectiveness analysis, one economic evaluation model, is presented as a potentially useful tool that can be employed in mental health settings. An overview of the definition, underlying assumptions, and procedures of cost-effectiveness analysis is provided. Issues relating to the manner in which cost and effectiveness information is presented to decision makers along with associated decision rules are also reviewed. It is concluded that it is difficult to “buy” the cost-effectiveness model as it now exists. Modifications in its assumptions, data gathering and data combination techniques are warranted so that the model can be applicable to mental health settings and policies. The general theme underlying suggested modifications is that values and constraints associated with all aspects of a cost-effectiveness problem must be made explicit and should guide analytic procedures.

Résumé

Compte tenu de l'augmentation des coûts et des demandes de services, les gouvernements commencent à exiger que les administrateurs des programmes de santé mentale fassent la démonstration d'un équilibre satisfaisant entre les résultats produits et les sommes investies. On présente un modèle d'évalation économique, l'analyse coût-bénéfice, comme un outil éventuellement utile dans le contexte des services de santé mentale. On propose une définition générale de l'analyse coût-bénéfice de même que des principes et des procédures. On rend compte des problèmes reliés à la façon de présenter l'information à ceux qui prennent des décisions en conformité avec certaines règles. On conclut qu'il est difficile d'adopter le modèle tel qu'il existe. Pour appliquer ce modèle aux situations et aux politiques de santé mentale, on suggère des modifications dans les principes de même que dans les techniques de cucillette et de traitement des données. Ces modifications reposent sur le fait que les valeurs et les contraintes associées à un problème de coût-bénéfice doivent ètre rendues explicites et servir de guide aux processus analytiques.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Volume 5Number 1April 1986
Pages: 77 - 88

History

Version of record online: 29 April 2009

Authors

Affiliations

Sue M. Weinstein
Thistletown Regional Centre, Rexdale, Ontario

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media