Open access

(DE)-Constructing Continuity of Care: The Deinstitutionalization of Support Services for People with Mental Health Problems

Publication: Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
April 1992

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to raise questions about appropriateness of the concept of continuity of care for guiding the development of helping strategies for people with mental health problems in the era of non-institutionalization. Research on continuity of care is reviewed to show the strong legacy of institutional thinking. A leading problem addressed in this literature is that of client drop-out from programs designed to ensure continuity. The research results clearly suggest that this “problem” lies with the agency of clients: the fact that, in the natural milieu, they make decisions according to their own definitions of the situation and in a social context of their own. This perspective, however, seemingly cannot be incorporated into the continuity of care paradigm, which remains firmly grounded in the world of service providers. We argue, therefore, that the era of the non-institutionalization calls for a recasting of the meaning of “continuity” for people with mental health problems, a reorientation of the type of research conducted in this domaine, and ultimately, a reformulation of the nature and role of support services in the community.

Résumé

L'objectif de cet article est de questionner la justesse du concept de «continuité de soins» comme fil conducteur des stratégies du soutien communautaire auprès des personnes qui ont des problèmes sévères du santé mentale. Une revue de la littérature démontre une forte influence de la pensée institutionnelle dans la conceptualisation de la continuité des soins de la question. Par exemple, un des problèmes majeurs abordés dans la recherche est celui du taux d'abandon des programmes conçus justement pour assurer la continuité des soins. Les résultats de ces recherches démontrent que ce problème relève du fait que le client ou l'usager est un acteur social plus ou moins autonome, qui va prendre des décisions selon ses propres perceptions de la situation et dans un contexte social qui lui est propre. Cette dimension n'est pas incorporée dans la problématique de la continuité des soins qui demeure fermement ancrée à la perspective des dispensateurs de services. Dans cet article, nous proposons que dans le contexte de la non-institutionnalisation, il faut repenser le concept de continuité pour les personnes qui connaissent des problèmes de santé mentale, reconsidérer le type de recherche à faire dans ce domaine, et finalement repenser le type et le rôle des services dans la communauté.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Volume 11Number 1April 1992
Pages: 85 - 99

History

Version of record online: 1 May 2009

Authors

Affiliations

Deena White
Université de Montréal

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media