Open access

Coercion and Community Treatment Orders (CTOs): One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?

Publication: Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
5 July 2010

Abstract

The shift from hospital-based care to community-based programs for people with serious and persistent mental illnesses has led to the creation of numerous treatment programs, including the recent implementation of community treatment orders (CTOs). This form of mandated outpatient commitment is controversial because it is widely acknowledged to be a coercive intervention. Yet, there is little discussion about why this intervention is considered coercive and whether coercion is acceptable in the context of emerging commitments to recovery for people with serious and persistent mental illnesses. Moreover, there is a need to evaluate whether CTOs advance or undermine the interests of people who are diagnosed with mental illness. This paper seeks to contribute to a discussion of these issues by exploring coercion and its role in community mental health care, and how it may co-exist with recovery in the implementation of community treatment orders.

Résumé

La transition du milieu hospitalier vers le milieu communautaire, en ce qui concerne les soins livrés aux personnes qui souffrent des maladies mentales sévères et persistantes, a entrainé de nombreux programmes de traitement, dont l'implantation récente des ordonnances de traitement en milieu communautaire. Ce type de traitement externe obligatoire soulève la contreverse parce qu'il est largement perçu comme une intervention coercitive. Or, il y a des questions qu'on n'a guère discutées: Pourquoi cette intervention est-elle jugée coercitive? La coercition est-elle acceptable dans le contexte de l'émergence d'un engagement envers le rétablissement des personnes souffrant des maladies mentales sévères et persistantes? En plus, il est nécessaire d'évaluer si les ordonnances de traitement en milieu communautaire avancent les intérêts des personnes identifiées comme souffrant d'une maladie mentale ou si, par contre, elles minent les intérêts de ces personnes. Cet article a pour but de contribuer à une discussion de ces questions en explorant la coercition et son rôle dans les soins communautaires de santé mentale. On examine aussi comment la coercition pourrait coexister avec le rétablissement dans l'implantation des ordonnances de traitement en milieu communautaire.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Volume 29Number 1April 2010
Pages: 69 - 80

History

Version of record online: 5 July 2010

Authors

Affiliations

Magnus Mfoafo-M'Carthy
Charmaine C. Williams

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media