Open access

Gender Bias in Family Benefit Provision

Publication: Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
September 1992

Abstract

Although the role of women in society has changed greatly in recent years, family benefit provisions may still be reflective of traditional notions of women's role as mother and homemaker. I examine this possibility through a case study of 120 collective agreements in a major Canadian union. In addition, the role of bargaining unit size, percentage of females in the bargaining unit, percentage of females on the negotiating committee and sector in the provision of family benefits are examined. It was found that the content and provision of family benefits were reflective of traditional notions of women. Through a step-wise multiple regression, it was also found that the percentage of females in a bargaining unit had the strongest predictive power of the four independent variables. Practical implications of the findings are discussed in light of current legislation governing the provision of family benefits and past research.

Résumé

Même si, durant ces dernières années, le rôle des femmes dans la société a beaucoup changé, les dispositions touchant les avantages sociaux familiaux continuent à refléter les conceptions traditionnelles de la femme dans des rôles de mére et de femme de maison. L'auteure étudie cette hypothèse dans 120 conventions collectives de syndicats canadiens importants. De plus, elle prend en compte l'effet de la grosseur des unités d'accréditation, du pourcentage de femmes dans ces unités et également, dans les comités de négociation, et du secteur d'emploi sur les dispositions touchant les avantages sociaux familiaux. Il ressort de l'étude que le contenu des dispositions relatives aux avantages sociaux familiaux reflétent des conceptions traditionnelles de la femme. Utilisant une analyse de régression multiple «étagée» (step-wise), on a trouvé également que le pourcentage de femmes dans les unités d'accréditation est le facteur prédictif le plus puissant parmi les quatres facteurs indépendants examinés. Les implications pratiques de ces résultats sont ensuite analysées à la lumière de la législation en vigeur réglant les dispositions des avantages sociaux familiaux et en regard aussi des recherches passées.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Volume 11Number 2September 1992
Pages: 163 - 185

History

Version of record online: 6 May 2009

Authors

Affiliations

Shannon Alyce O'Brien
The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media