Open access

The Social Reconstruction of Sexual Assault by Women Victims: A Comparison of Therapeutic Experiences

Publication: Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
September 1986

Abstract

In this study, the conventionally accepted view of sexual violence against women as manifested by traditional therapy is contrasted with the feminist perspective represented by feminist therapy and feminist self-help groups for victims of sexual assault. The focus of the research is on the ways in which consumers of different therapies are taught socially to reconstruct their sexual assault experiences. On the basis of intensive interviews with victims of sexual assault or incest who have subsequently experienced therapy, the reconstructions of the assault encouraged by conventional therapeutic approaches are found to differ sharply from those developed in feminist modalities. The conclusion is that conventional therapies for victim of sexual assault tend to perpetuate the existing belief structure about rape and incest by isolating and blaming the victim. In contrast, feminist counselling and feminist self-help groups remove the woman's false sense of guilt, validate the woman's experience with sexual violence, and enable the victim to develop an understanding of the social structural context in which sexual assault occurs.

Résumé

Dans la présente étude, on souligne le contraste entre, d'une part, la perspective habituellement acceptée par la thérapie traditionnelle à propos de la violence sexuelle exercée contre les femmes, et, d'autre part, l'approche féministe représentée par la thérapie féministe et les groupes de support pour les victimes d'abus sexuels. La recherche porte sur la façon d'enseigner socialement aux consommatrices des différentes approches thérapeutiques à reconstruire l'expérience de violence sexuelle. Des entrevues en profondeur avec des victimes d'abus sexuels ou d'inceste qui ont par la suite eu recours à la thérapie, indiquent des différences trés claires entre les reconstructions encouragées par les approaches conventionnelles et celles propoées par les modalités féministes. On conclut que les thérapies conventionnelles tendent à perpétuer les croyances qui isolent et blâment les victimes tandis que l'approche féministe écarte les faux sentiments de culpabilité, valide l'expérience vécue par la femme et l'aide à comprendre le contexte structurel social dans lequel émerge cette violence.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Volume 5Number 2September 1986
Pages: 17 - 36

History

Version of record online: 23 April 2009

Authors

Affiliations

Chris Huntley Hutchinson
University of Waterloo
Susan A. McDaniel
University of Waterloo

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media